|
The
Horton Report
Current
Issue #7
================
If I told
you the quickest way to win the undying respect and admiration
of your organization's legal counsel is for you to conduct a company
investigation you would probably tell me I'm crazy, especially
if you've done one before. You're probably saying to yourself,
"Any time I do an investigation corporate counsel should
get down on their knees and kiss the ground I walk on because
they didn't have to do it." And you're right!
Investigations
are horrible for one big reason-it's practically impossible to
know who is telling the truth. As if the investigations aren't
bad enough, some may result in you being cross-examined by an
employee's attorney two years later about why you believed the
people you say you believed. Because you never know which investigation
will result in that kind of cross-examination I'm going to outline
a process you can use in every investigation to decide who is
telling the truth.
My first
piece of advice is, go easy on yourself. In over 25 years trying
employment law cases and interviewing thousands of witnesses,
I was never "positive" who was telling the truth. And
I knew the judges and juries could not tell either, but they had
to make a decision. How did they do it?
Every
court in the United States gives juries a written set of criteria
to determine who to believe. All courts use essentially the same
criteria which provide a multi-factor analysis to get to the truth.
The next time you conduct an investigation, you can use the same
factors judges and juries use:
1. Will
a witness gain or lose if you decide things a certain way?
2. What is the witness's relationship to the parties?
3. How did a witness learn the facts? How does he or she know,
remember, and tell the facts?
4. What is his or her manner and appearance?
5. What is his or her age and experience? [Did he really say Age?
Yes, it's okay to use age in this case.]
6. Does the witness seem honest and sincere?
7. Is the witness frank and direct?
8. Is what the witness is saying reasonable compared with other
evidence?
9. Are there any other factors that bear on believability and
the weight you will give to what the person has said?
10. In addition, you should rely on your own experience, good
judgment, and common sense.
11. If you apply these same criteria to your determination you
may still be wrong, just like juries and judges sometimes conclude
wrongly. However, any jury you may have to face will know you
had a tough job because it is the same one they have been called
to do. You also stand to gain tremendous credibility with them
if you used the same factors the judge has told them they should
use.
A word
of caution. You may run into corporate counsel who does not want
you to use these factors. Some attorneys want their witnesses
to give vague answers. I have a huge problem with that approach
and you should, too. Here's why. If you get on the witness stand
and tell the jury, "I can't tell you why I believed so and
so, I just did, you had to be there," you will look stupid.
Guess what? You're not stupid and the jury knows you wouldn't
have the position you do if you were. If the jury thinks you're
trying to look stupid, they may assume you have something to hide.
Why is that important? Because in deciding whom to believe the
jury applies the same factors I just listed to your testimony!
Look at numbers 6 and 7. "Did the witness seem honest and
sincere?" "Was the witness frank and direct?" If
the jury believes you are not honest and sincere, frank and direct
it will go very badly for you and your case every time. I guarantee
it.
Rule: When doing investigations use the same written criteria/factors
judges and juries use to determine who is telling the truth.
No one can determine who is telling the truth with "absolute
certainty." All you can do is put into place a process that
gives you the best shot at it. It will make your job infinitely
easier and increase the likelihood you have made a correct decision.
In the
next issue of The Horton Report, I'll show you how to use the
criteria in this process for report writing. You'll also learn
why you should write a report on every investigation and learn
how to do that quickly and easily with the format I'm going to
give you.
|